Common legal principal used in CLAT

Home Common legal principal used in CLAT

Common Legal Principles Used in CLAT (Legal Reasoning Section)
1. Principle of Strict Liability

Definition: A person may be held liable for certain acts even if there was no negligence or intention to cause harm.
Leading Case: Rylands v. Fletcher (1868)
Explanation: If someone brings something dangerous onto their land, and it escapes causing damage, they are strictly liable.

  1. Principle of Vicarious Liability

Definition: A person is held responsible for the acts of another, typically an employer for the acts of their employee.
Example: If a delivery driver negligently hits someone during work hours, the employer may be liable.
3. Principle of Natural Justice

Definition: Basic procedural fairness in legal matters.
Two Key Rules:
Audi Alteram Partem (Hear the other side)
Nemo Judex in Causa Sua (No one should be a judge in their own case)
Explanation: Everyone must get a fair chance to be heard before a decision is taken.

  1. Principle of Mens Rea (Guilty Mind)
    Definition: A person can only be held criminally liable if they intended to commit the crime.
    Example: If someone causes harm accidentally, they may not be criminally liable.


    5. Doctrine of Precedent

Definition: Courts follow the decisions made in earlier similar cases (stare decisis).
Explanation: Ensures consistency and predictability in law.

6. Principle of Volenti Non Fit Injuria
Definition: If someone consents to the risk, they cannot later complain of injury.
Example: A boxer injured during a match cannot sue for battery.


  1. Principle of Res Ipsa Loquitur
    Meaning: “The thing speaks for itself”
    Explanation: Used in torts – when harm wouldn’t normally occur unless someone was negligent.
    Example: A patient has a surgical tool left inside after surgery.

    8. Principle of Legal Fiction

Definition: Assumption made by law to treat something as true, even if it’s not, for legal purposes.
Example: A company is treated as a “legal person”.


  1. Principle of Burden of Proof
    Definition: The obligation to prove one’s claim.
    Explanation: In criminal cases, prosecution must prove guilt; in civil cases, plaintiff must prove harm.

 10. Principle of Caveat Emptor

Definition: “Let the buyer beware”
Explanation: The buyer must examine the goods and buy at their own risk.

Tips for CLAT Legal Reasoning:


Read principle carefully.
Apply only the given principle, not personal knowledge.
Stick to facts in the question.
Practice daily with mock tests.

Comment